The Holy Bible King James Version: King James Version


Price: $4.95

 

Product Features

  • ISBN13: 9781565633254
  • Condition: New
  • Notes: BUY WITH CONFIDENCE, Over one million books sold! 98% Positive feedback. Compare our books, prices and service to the competition. 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed
 

Editorial Reviews


Product Description

If you are looking for a Bible that’s easy to use and to give away, this is the Bible for you!

The world is hungry for eternal truth. When we spread God’s Word, we’re helping to fulfill the Great Commission. Now you can reach more people with this handy, budget-friendly edition.

With no frills or extras that increase the page count or the price, this economy KJV Bible is the ideal choice for a basic introduction to Scripture, for daily devotions, worship, prison ministry, evangelistic outreach, missions, or any occasion when you want to read and share God's Word.

Special Features • Complete KJV text • Simple, straightforward presentation • Convenient size • Affordable price—keep a supply on hand!

 

Similar Products

 

Customer Reviews


A Person Said: Slyly-written vision book. Jul. 19th 2010

The Holy Scripture is a slyly-written fantasy book which could be fun for grouping of every ages, if it weren't for individual factors:

1. Too much exposition: Unfortunately, the from the beginning, the book gets bogged downbound in farther likewise much exposition - ofttimes to the saucer of redundancy.

2. Incoherent writing style: The composition style is not at every coherent - portions of the aggregation seem to be cursive by very assorted authors. In my opinion, the communicator haw suffer from an modern modify of multiple-personality disorder.

3. Historical inaccuracies: The aggregation is filled with arts inaccuracies to the point that teen people might become confused as to the actual nature of history. While this often is ordinary in vision books, most books run to have a fantasy concern setting, whereas this aggregation is set on on our own Earth, much same the esteemed nobleman of the Rings trilogy and another related books .

4. Confusing storyline: In whatever portions of the book, the important character, God, contradicts himself and his possess rules - if the aggregation is feat to ordered up rules for its fantasy world, it should probably stick to them. ---SPOILER ALERT--- In the rattling first chapter, there are digit accounts of "creation".

5. Subject matter: This aggregation contains more violence than kindred fantasy novels, and includes themes such as rape and incest, which should be considered discover of the realm of normal for teens and junior children.

If it weren't for the various problems traded above, this would be a top-notch vision book, on-par with CS Lewis's Narnia books or Tolkien's Middle Earth books.

Ronald D. Bruner Jr. Said: Should be illegal. THIS IS A WORK OF FICTION! May. 10th 2010

Seriously people.... An invisible Negro with oceanic powers who crapper control everything including time? And he loves us so such that he allows strict competition supported solely on birthplace? i.e. Indians existence Hindu, Asians existence Buddhists, Arabs existence Muslims, etc? You have to be rattling dopy to conceive some of this.

Richard E. Noble Said: The Hobo Philosopher Apr. 30th 2010

I definite to go backwards and read the Scripture erst again but I don't think that I can continue. It is too confusing. Let me demonstrate:

"In the beginning God Created the heaven and the Earth."

First I have a problem with a pair of terms here; beginning, God, created, heaven and earth.
In the beginning of what?
In the first of God? In the first of the universe? Is "In the beginning" existence suggestive of the implausible notion that there was a instance in the phylogenesis of "existence" when there was nothing or when there was null but God?
In the beginning before there was an Earth? before there were planets? before the universe that we understand as it exists today formed into what it now is?
I don't see how there could have ever hit been a instance when there was nothing. The idea that "something" can come from "nothing" is impracticable as far as I know.
"Nothing" is defined as that state of non-being or non-existence with no capacity or possibleness ever to become anything. This is ground we call this construct nothing. Nothing is nothing.
If in the first there was nothing, then as a event there would ease be null today. But since there is something today "nothing" is but a term utilised in language to exposit an impossibility or a theoretical explanation. To say that null represents something or whatever possibility is same asking what turn does 0 set represent; or how such is zero. It is nonsense.

In the beginning there was something and we are feat to refer to that something as God? Is this what the communicator is proposing?

God? The presumption is that we every know the definition of this term. I hit learned that there are as some definitions of this constituent as there are individuals who use the word. But I presume that in generalized the communicator is suggesting that before there was anything that is today constituted there was a obligate or entity or power which was someways answerable for swing into motion and cosmos every that we understand as cosmos today. I module permit the ingest of this articulate slide for the moment and we module pay attention and wager if it is more clearly circumscribed as we go on.

Created? I have feature some definitions of this word. Some feature that the term "created" describes the ability of an existing abstract to bring something into existence from "nothing." This as I see is the definition of this word as is acknowledged by the whole Christian concern and some non-Christians.

To alter something into existence from nothing is by my discernment of these cost not possible. So in my opinion if this is the basis of your explanation of Existence you are premising every that you believe on an impossibility. This I would say is the artist warning of building your house on a weak foundation.

I module then move that what the author is locution is that; In the Beginning ? God ? created - course produced either from his being as manlike parents or animals or another experience things create a child, an offspring, or added experience cell, every of cosmos - enliven and inanimate; or that God ? the force, power or whatever imaginatively formed a newborn thing from other things that were existing previously. As in the behave of invention, or artistic representations or "creation."

The heaven?
That mysterious locate talked about by religious mystics and ofttimes contrasted with inferno - as in my blue heaven of just Molly and me and child makes three? Or is the communicator referring to the sky or the atmosphere? Or does the use of this constituent administer to "the heavens" - interpreted as the Universe. The Universe defined as all that exists.

The Earth is the only ostensibly ultimate term in this sentence. I module presume the communicator means this planet or sphere as we know, have famous and module continue to know it.

And the Earth was without form, and void;
Oh brother, just when we thought we had digit country term in this sentence, it's gone.
If the earth is without form and void - then there is no earth. If void effectuation blank or containing "nothing" and form means shape, dimension, perimeters and the like then if the earth has no appearance or form or dimensions and is imperturbable of "nothing" then it isn't anything. So in the beginning this God created something that the author has named as the connector but describes as a non-entity or in effect nothing.

So in the beginning there was nothing; but God denaturized the nothing that was there in locate somewhere? into added null that the communicator has called the earth.

This isn't making some significance but we module continue.

And darkness was upon the face of the deep.

Darkness was upon the face of the deep what? Face? Is face supposed to stingy surface. And scene was upon the surface of the deep.
The deep? The deep ocean? the unfathomable universe? the unfathomable heaven? the unfathomable earth? the unfathomable nothingness? the unfathomable God? Does "the scene was upon the face of the deep" mean that God was frowning? Darkness was on the face of God?

And the fiber of God moved upon the face of the waters.

The spirit of God? God has a embody and a spirit? His spirit moves? It goes from place to place? It is an entity that is limited by dimensions? It can go from the kitchen to the bedroom? God is a experience agitated thing with structure and modify separate from another things who is confident of moving from locate to place? God is an individualist entity and not a obligate or a noesis or an energy? God is one and individual and distinguishable from another things? God is an existing thing?

Where is He? Is this thing visible? Has it ever been seen? Does God have the capacity to strike into another things?

And the spirit of God touched upon the face of the water. The author effectuation to say that the fiber of God moves upon the opencast of the water? Water doesn't hit a face.

Where the heck did this water become from anyway? The Earth is vacuum and without modify - remember. How does it hold water? The Earth is without form and it is void.

So we have the fiber of an entity that is representative of every that was "in the beginning." This entity is individual and separate and it is agitated upon the surface of an empty, formless, dark, dimensionless void that is filled or somehow contains water.

I could go on but I staleness adopt this will not get some better.
I think this is more of a "poetry" book. Poetry doesn't have to make sense.




Pero Leuco Said: Not the prizewinning book ever. Apr. 23rd 2010

This book is not worth the time it takes to read! It did hit a few high points, such as bears slaughtering children. Overall, though, it is mostly devoid of anything resembling broad quality prose.

Allen P. town Said: I'm pretty trusty they don't speak 17th century arts in heaven! Apr. 20th 2010

I grew up on KJV, and sure, I learned a aggregation from the bible that way. But I really didn't see to fuck the bible. The fact is, the King saint movement is an impediment to discernment the genuine meaning and especially the passion of the bible.

Today, most people rely on NIV, but that's been around at least two generations now, and you can tell that today's TV / machine generation zones discover apace when you feature them a lawmaking from that.

Some time ago, I discovered the NLT2e New Living Translation, 2nd Ed. This is a fantastic translation that provides God's articulate to us in meaning equal English. I have finished such comparison with Luther's German movement unfortunately I don't know Greek or Hebrew... , and I hit found that this awing translation is quite accurate. What's really enthusiastic most it, though, is it's simplicity. All three of my children were healthy to join our kinsfolk devotion and read aloud from their possess copy when they were in prototypal grade. I fuck that! My youngest in first grade now asks to feature during devotions. It's wonderful!

I detected that the reviewer wrote: "The world is hungry for unending truth. When we distribute God's Word, we're serving to fulfill the Great Commission." Question: What do YOU conceive happens when someone asks you to explain your faith, and you verify them "Well, God so loveth the world that he giveth blah blah blah..." Psh! Psh! That's a face-slapping sound... Wake up! God told Samuel: "People judge by superficial appearance, but the nobleman looks at the heart."

The Lord looks at our hearts! If you're hunting at someone's heart, you're not worried most what color their skin is, or how such money they have, or what their "sexual preference" is. solon than that, you don't tending what language they speak or what infirm version of English.

So why not learn God's articulate in plain English?

The problems we have today are not some different than some that hit been experienced down through history. If you poverty to support someone by pointing them in God's direction, do them a actual favor: Hand them an NLT instead of a KJV.